Sunday, March 17, 2013

God's Ultimate Purpose in Stories by Bill Crofton


As he drew near to Egypt, he said to his wife, Sarai, “Look.  we both know that you’re a beautiful woman.  When the Egyptians see you they’re going to say, Aha! That’s his wife! And kill me.  But they’ll let you live.  Do me a favor:  tell them you’re my sister.  Because of you, they’ll welcome me and let me live.”

When Abram arrived in Egypt, the Egyptians took one look and saw that his wife was stunningly beautiful.  Pharaoh’s princes raved over her to Pharaoh.  She was taken to live with Pharaoh.

Because of her, Abram got along very well: he accumulated sheep and cattle, male and female donkeys, men and women servants, and camels.  But God hit Pharaoh hard because of Abram’s wife, Sarai; everybody in the palace got seriously sick.

Pharaoh called for Abram, “What’s this that you’ve done to me?  Why didn’t you tell me that she’s your wife?  Why did you say, ‘She’s my sister’ so that I’d take her as my wife?  Here’s your wife back—take her and get out!”

Pharaoh ordered his men to get Abram out of the country.  They sent him and his wife and everything he owned on their way.”  (Genesis 12:11-20, The Message)

At the Egyptian border, Abraham realized he has a problem.  In his mind, a lie is the solution.  Ever been there?  Strictly speaking, Abraham was simply being “economical” with the truth, correct?  Sarah was his half-sister, as he points out when repeating this deception again later in Genesis 20:12.  (The Hebrew language uses words equivalent to brother and sister more loosely than English does.) 

Giving the impression that the lovely Sarah is unattached will mean someone gets attached to her.  At the time, perhaps it was acceptable for Abraham to take action to keep the family alive through the famine, but was this the point at which Abraham needed to trust God? Did he have any right to risk Sarah in order to safeguard his own skin? Should Sarah have refused to cooperate; could she not see where all this would lead?

The lovely and astonishing beautiful Sarah is duly taken into Pharaoh’s household—in other words, into his harem.  Genesis delicately refrains from telling us what happened there; maybe the epidemic intervened before anything happened to Sarah.  Nor does it tell us how Pharaoh managed to put two and two together.

Genesis makes no comment on the rights and wrongs of Abraham’s action, and there are several possible implications.

One is that Genesis doesn’t think the question of when Abraham went wrong is the important one.  I know that could seem odd to our Western mindsets because of assumptions we make about the Bible’s purpose.  Don’t we often think the Bible exists to tell us how to live, that its stories provide illustrations of the right and wrong kind of life, and that in order for them to function this way, they need to pass explicit judgments on what happens?   Okay, that was a long question.  But don’t we?

What if, Genesis does not tell us its stories mainly or simply to give us good and bad examples?  What if it’s mainly about God?  Is that too hard to conceive?  Could it be about a purpose God is pursuing in the world, and now pursuing through Abraham & Sarah?  Stories about Abraham and Sarah are there not so much to tell us about them, but to tell us how God relates to them in fulfilling that purpose.

One way or another, this story tells us how they got into a mess; its significance then lies in the fact that God got them OUT OF IT, right?  They had an experience a bit like Adam and Eve’s when the weird creature showed up in the garden, or like Noah’s when the fruit of the vine turned out to make something happen that he had not bargained for (or maybe he did).  These things happen.  Life happens, right?  The GOOD NEWS is that God does NOT abandon them.

I have to tell you, coming to the Old Testament book of Genesis this time, at this time in my life, trying hard to lay aside my previous biases, understandings, and possible narrow prejudices has been difficult . . . but a “wee” bit more exciting.

Bill Crofton


No comments:

Post a Comment