We recently posted a clip of our worship leaders singing the
famous Bill Withers song, "Lean on Me." The song was sung at
the end of our church service as the response to a sermon focused on community
in Christ. It began with a single vocalist who was joined, one-by-one, by
four other singers arriving on the platform from the congregation. The
message of our need to follow Christ's directive to live in community was
powerful, and many who were present—as well as many who later saw it on video—were
moved and inspired. Both the song and the singers were intentionally
chosen as a representation of the gender, cultural, generational and spiritual
diversity of our church community.
However, not everyone who saw the clip felt the same
positive "community of Christ" moment described above. Some
questioned the value of using this popular 70's tune as a means to communicate
a Godly message. While we understand that there are some who place great
value on separating the "secular" from the "sacred," we at
FHC have leaned much more toward the model of Paul when he said in 1
Corinthians, "I have become all things to all people so that by all
possible means I might save some."
I found one comment particularly interesting (intentionally
unedited):
“If
this was a non-denominational church(which in all honestly it really is) I
wouldn't have as much of a problem with, it would even be expected. But we
should be a peculiar people and are held to a different standard. How is this
church different from any other non-denom. church. how is this atmosphere going
to help people grow spiritually in a world that is were they comforted right
into complacency and indifference to spiritual standard that are put in place
by the BIBLE! When you don't show respect for something you more then likely
are not willing to make a stand for it. That is a hollow and fragile faith that
when tested, I have seen in my own life during that period of time(FHC) in my
faith broke down and it wasn't till I re-recommitted my life to the LORD and
took it serious(respected it) that true change came and I had confidence and
faith in the religion that I believe in.”
We always appreciate response to our posts and respect and
learn from those with opinions not our own.
Without a doubt, this comment represents a group of people who are more
traditional in their view of worship and the purpose of church. I though it was interesting that the words could
resonate with that group but also come across to me as an affirmation of what
FHC has been intentionally trying to build for years.
Our goal at FHC has never been to be identified by our
denomination. Our goal is to be
identified by Christ alone. This may be
out of the comfort zone for some who believe their uniqueness as a denomination
is their special calling from God. In
that case, they probably would not find a church home at FHC. Those seeking
“confidence and faith in the religion
that [they] believe in,” will understandably choose to worship elsewhere.
FHC feels strongly that the “peculiarity” Christians of all denominations should be known for is
the way we love – love each other and the world around us. This means we will never meet the expectations
of those looking for a church that strives to be known by the peculiarity of
their twist on religious beliefs.
I’m thankful for the variety of churches that offer each
individual a place to explore their faith.
My prayer is that, regardless of which church a person decides to
attend, their experience gives them an understanding of Jesus’ love and grace
that will make a difference in the world around them.
Tami Cinquemani
Well written and I believe it!!
ReplyDeleteIt is with fear and trepidation that I respond to this blog. Perhaps Tami will leave my remarks intentionally unedited to subtly imply ignorance.
ReplyDeleteI have several observations:
Tami states that the FHC strives to be like Paul by "becoming all things to all people" and yet she admonishes the traditional worshippers that if they don't like what they find there they can go elsewhere. The FHC isn't interested in saving the traditional believer?
"Our goal at FHC has never been to be identified by our denomination" . Really? Who decided that? The elders? Church board? The church at a business meeting? The church voted on that? Am I wrong in assuming that the FHC is indeed a Seventh-day Adventist Church that should uphold and affirm the doctrines and beliefs of that denomination? I looked at the FHC website and found instead of the 28 fundamental beliefs there are 13 redundant beliefs that state in various ways that they love Jesus, Jesus loves them, and he died for them, and they love others. A wonderful true message of every SDA church. What happened with the good news of the state of the dead? The good news of the second coming? the good news of the Sabbath?
Tami is an excellent writer and has carefully chosen specific words to imply a rigid traditional denominationally- bound "wrong" believer ..."twisted" "uniqueness" "special calling" "religion they believe in" "peculiarity" . She seems to imply that if someone has a doctrinal set of beliefs that guide their life, they do not or cannot follow Christ and love as well. It is not an either/or. I have known many many SDA's who follow the doctrines of their church and love others in astonishing ways.
I understand what Tami is trying to say...love trumps all. And I am tired as she is of the surface arguments about taste in music. However, I am also tired of the disowning of the doctrines of the SDA church, of the attitude that those who reject the doctrine as being more full of love, and the implication that they are more spiritual.
It would seem to me that those who have to point out that they love may not be showing it as much as they think. Those who truly love do not need to proclaim it, promote their loving acts, and set apart special days to demonstrate love. It just happens by being connected to the lover of the world.
Anonymous:
ReplyDeletePlease accept my apologies if my words suggested I believe people are saved based on their preferences for worship (which I think we agree goes far beyond musical tastes). This couldn't be further from the truth. I am thankful that God speaks to us and through us in a wide variety of ways. As a Worship Director whose job it is to create opportunities of authentic and relevant worship for those attending FHC, I also realize that not every individual will feel that they can worship comfortably or authentically at every church. This could simply be a matter of culture or preference.
By suggesting someone may not choose to "find their home" at FHC, I only meant that everyone should be encouraged to find a church home where they feel they can worship with integrity. We are blessed in the Orlando area with a large number of SDA churches that offer a wide variety of worship opportunities. Each person needs to find a church home where they can engage and participate with an open heart.
The Florida Hospital Church is unapologetically a Seventh-day Adventist Church. I am sure you and I would agree that the purpose of every one of our doctrines is solely to point us toward our Savior, Jesus Christ. Our understanding of things like the state of the dead, the second coming, or the Sabbath are wonderful truths, but they are not an end to themselves. They are beautiful tools that point to a loving, merciful, and gracious God. Our mission is to share this God with our community and our world. Therefore, a life surrendered to and lived for Christ is what FHC members are called to exemplify.
I believe there are probably many things we would agree on - the most important things - and I look forward to someday meeting you and continuing our discussion.
Blessings,
Tami